Created page with "{{header | title = New Spawn Weekly Summary | previous = 2025-02-02 | next = 2025-02-16 }} {{mail | wrap = 1 | from = {{P|1F616EMO}} | to = {{P|$everyone}} | date = ''Draft'' | subject = New Spawn: Weekly Summary 2025-02-09 | content = <!-- --><p>Weekly summary for 2025-02-03 to 2025-02-09. Check other suggestions: {{UrlShortener|3P}}</p><!-- --><p>'''Land around the new Spawn''' <br />T..." |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| subject = New Spawn: Weekly Summary 2025-02-09 | | subject = New Spawn: Weekly Summary 2025-02-09 | ||
| content = <!-- | | content = <!-- | ||
--><p>Weekly summary for 2025-02-03 to 2025-02-09. Check other suggestions: {{UrlShortener|3P}}</p><!-- | --><p>Weekly summary for 2025-02-03 to 2025-02-09. Check other suggestions: {{UrlShortener|3P}} <br />You may reply to this email to comment on the discussed topics.</p><!-- | ||
--><p>'''Land around the new Spawn''' <br />Topic: Land, Economics </p><!-- | --><p>'''Land around the new Spawn''' <br />Topic: Land, Economics </p><!-- | ||
--><p>HelenasaurusRex: A catchment area... players are allowed to build within a radius around spawn, without asking for permission, but if they haven't asked for permission then you can mercilessly demolish them to make room for new developments. (2025/02/02 22:55:51) <br />HelenasaurusRex: That would be a way to deal with the risk of not being able to easily expand it in the future. (2025/02/02 22:56:37) <br />HelenasaurusRex: But that is a harsh way... (2025/02/02 22:57:26) <br />HelenasaurusRex: One way could be to just accept the protected area we've got or expand it now. (2025/02/02 22:57:56) <br />1F616EMO: Gotta think of ur suggestion tmr cuz I gotta sleep, but IMO removing structures w/o asking them is really rude (2025/02/02 22:59:20) <br />HelenasaurusRex: Yea, agreed, it was a harsh suggestion. (2025/02/02 22:59:38) <br />1F616EMO: My preference is to do an oversized protection over where it might be occupied (IMO, the current one is more than enough), then shrink it as we establish the boundaries. Regarding newcomers' lands, I have plenty of decent land around Grape Hills Main Station and Shino Station that can be used as newcomers' settlement lands. (2025/02/03 11:58:04)</p><!-- | --><p>HelenasaurusRex: A catchment area... players are allowed to build within a radius around spawn, without asking for permission, but if they haven't asked for permission then you can mercilessly demolish them to make room for new developments. (2025/02/02 22:55:51) <br />HelenasaurusRex: That would be a way to deal with the risk of not being able to easily expand it in the future. (2025/02/02 22:56:37) <br />HelenasaurusRex: But that is a harsh way... (2025/02/02 22:57:26) <br />HelenasaurusRex: One way could be to just accept the protected area we've got or expand it now. (2025/02/02 22:57:56) <br />1F616EMO: Gotta think of ur suggestion tmr cuz I gotta sleep, but IMO removing structures w/o asking them is really rude (2025/02/02 22:59:20) <br />HelenasaurusRex: Yea, agreed, it was a harsh suggestion. (2025/02/02 22:59:38) <br />1F616EMO: My preference is to do an oversized protection over where it might be occupied (IMO, the current one is more than enough), then shrink it as we establish the boundaries. Regarding newcomers' lands, I have plenty of decent land around Grape Hills Main Station and Shino Station that can be used as newcomers' settlement lands. (2025/02/03 11:58:04)</p><!-- | ||
-->}} | -->}} | ||
Revision as of 12:01, 3 February 2025
| From: | 1F616EMO |
|---|---|
| To: | $everyone |
| Date: | Draft |
| Subject: | New Spawn: Weekly Summary 2025-02-09 |
Weekly summary for 2025-02-03 to 2025-02-09. Check other suggestions: https://wiki-twi.1f616emo.xyz/s/3P Land around the new Spawn HelenasaurusRex: A catchment area... players are allowed to build within a radius around spawn, without asking for permission, but if they haven't asked for permission then you can mercilessly demolish them to make room for new developments. (2025/02/02 22:55:51) | |